About Me

Name: C. L. Palmer
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

Blaming Bush Limit

Okay, what's Obama's time limit when it comes to blaming things on the Bush administration? How long does he get to pass the buck? He's spent over nine trillion dollars of our money, ended any form of interrogation more forceful than asking "pretty please," and kissed up to dictators and terrorists around the world. When the natural consequences of these actions come to pass (and rest assured that they will), will he get to blame them on Bush?
 
I say, anything that happens after year one is all Obama's. The reason I'm giving for this time limit is simply to avoid hypocrisy. We all realize that 9-11 happened largely due to Clinton's emasculation of our intelligence-gathering network and his refusal to act against Al-Qaida, even when offered Bin Laden on a silver platter. 9-11 happened less than nine months into Bush's first term, so I'll be generous and give Obama an extra three months of Bush-bashing. One year; that ought to be enough. Now, I realize that the MSM will allow him to get away with it for as long as he likes. Odds are, he'll be blaming the failures of his policies on Bush well into term two, if (God forbid) he gets one. Still, even as jaded as I am about the intellectual capacity of people these days, I have faith that America will see through the BS and hold Obama responsible when the bill comes due for his insane policies.
 
Psychologically, it makes sense for Obama to pass the blame, especially to George W. Bush, a white guy. You can't go to Jeremiah Wright's church for twenty-plus years and not absorb that tendency into your psyche to at least some degree. The reason people listen to the Wrights, Sharptons, and Jesse Jacksons of the world is precisely because they have failed to accept personal responsibility for their own circumstances. Obama is part of this mindset, make no mistake about it. Nothing that goes wrong during his administration will be his fault, because he is a victim- of racism, of Bush, of the media, etcetera ad nauseum. The fact that he's simply playing out of the same old, dog-eared liberal playbook won't matter, even though those tactics have all been proven failures time and again. Somehow, it will be Bush's fault.
 
But I, for one, won't be buying it. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Dark Knight: Batman as Bush

Watching Glenn Beck one night, I realized that the latest Batman movie does indeed have conservative overtones. That got me thinking. I started to analyze certain parallels that stuck out to me.
 
First of all, the actor who plays Batman bears more than a passing resemblance to a young George W. Bush. He has the same smirk and mannerisms. You won't be able to watch the movie again without noticing this, once somebody suggests it.
 
Second, Batman decides that he must do what many would consider out-of-bounds to protect his city. He decides that he must be the hero Goham needs, not just the one it wants. He realizes that to protect those he has sworn to protect, he must be despised by many of them. Who does that sound like but President Bush? He uses "rough interrogation." He keeps things close to the vest, even from law enforcement, whom he does not trust. George W. Bush has been plagued by leftover Clinonistas in the FBI and CIA; Batman's efforts were hampered by cops beholden to the mob. Eerily similar...
 
Third, Batman decides that the only way to protect the citizenry is to listen in on conversations all over the city. Essentially, he is wire-tapping. He programs the system to lock on only to the voice of the terrorist he seeks, just as Bush listens in only on conversations with suspected terrorists. He, and his staff, have reservations over this, but in the end decide that it is a better alternative than doing nothing. He never goes outside of his mission objectives with it, however. It is an "emergency power," and the program is dismantled when its objective has been met.
 
The moral of the story is that sometimes you must sacrifice your personal pride and desires to protect your people. They may not be grateful, and may, indeed, roundly criticize you for your actions. However, in order to serve them properly, you must be ready to absorb that criticism and not let it distract you from your mission. With regard to the war on terror, this has been the exact philosophy of the Bush administration.
 
I have many areas of disagreement with President Bush, but this movie made me see him in a new light. When protecting this country from terrorists, men who "just want to watch the world burn," Bush is Batman. He will be vindicated by history, at least in this area, the seminal issue of our time. In this respect, he is truly a hero. 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »